Page 14

Three Days Off Writing and I Lose My Mind (and My Mojo)

There’s a rhythm to writing that’s hard to describe unless you’ve lived it. It’s not about flow, productivity, word count, or even deadlines; it’s about movement. That sense that your mind, even on a nature walk, is turning over, processing, sorting, sharpening. Even when the words don’t seem quite right, at least you know the engine is running. It may be on cruise control or in first gear, but it’s running.

When I write regularly, almost daily, I feel grounded. I feel awake and present. But things start to unravel when I don’t, especially over a long stretch like a three-day weekend (yes, three days is a long time for me not to write). The engine stalls and the rhythm breaks. And I don’t feel a little off—I feel like I’ve lost something important.

The last long weekend in Canada, May 17-19, I gave myself permission to rest. Full stop for three days. No deadlines, no personal or professional projects, no word counts, no blogs, no notebook and pen, no pressure. It was peaceful. It was quiet. It was, well, … uncomfortable. I read once that Stephen King not just likes, but has to write every day or he goes a little crazy. The story, perhaps apocryphal, reflects the mind of many writers. I’m not in his league, but I understand where he comes from.

Day one? Fine. Yeah, it’s nice to visit friends, do a nature walk, read a print publication, stare out at the lake or off into space and not think about anything; just let my mind go where it goes as long as it doesn’t go into negative territory because the way my mental circuitry is, negative thinking tends to spiral. Day two? Another nature walk, a few errands, more reading, and hanging with a different group of friends. I am a little restless, but it’s manageable. Day three? Forget it. I felt like I was crawling out of my own skin. Not from boredom, but from the absence of something I’ve come to rely on: the act of writing. Not for show, not even always for public consumption —just writing as a way to breathe through this thing we call life. It was nice to rest my eyes from looking at the computer and phone for three days, and they did need it, but damn it, where was my notebook and pen.

I’m not saying I can’t take a break. I’m saying I shouldn’t take too long of one. Because somewhere between “well-deserved rest” and “completely unplugged” lies a dangerous place for me: disconnection. My brain doesn’t slow down just because I stop typing. When I stop writing, it starts spinning harder. Not out of control racing thoughts, serious stress harder. More like a controlled, thoughtful spin. Thoughts pile up like unread emails and I lose my rhythm, my clarity, my sense of direction. I get antsy and frustrated, and feel like I’m stagnating. On day four, like the working Tuesday after the holiday Monday, it’s a struggle to find my rhythm again, and I do what I call piecework and grinding it out —a bit of this, a bit of that. I’m fine by the afternoon, but Tuesday morning, while I do get stuff done, is haphazard. I don’t have my best stuff workwise, or for more personal writing and blogging. I realize everyone eases back into things after a long weekend, but for me, this can be any three-day stretch of not writing. So, do I bring my laptop when heading to a sun-soaked destination for a week or more? Sometimes, but it usually stays dark. However, I do bring something to read, my phone for photographs, and a notebook and pens to jot down the memories from the trip and whatever else comes to mind.

Some people restore themselves through silence, sleep, or solitude. I need a few words on a page. Not a masterpiece; just movement. That’s the key. It’s something to signal that I’m still in motion and still in the game. Still connected to that part of me that makes sense of this world by stringing letters into thoughts and thoughts into something worth holding onto. And when I skip that process for too long, everything else feels just a bit off. It’s a surreal place that makes me feel as if I exist in a parallel universe I don’t belong in.

The irony? I believe in rest and sometimes grumble that I need a break. I’ve run on empty. I’ve been burned out more than once. I mean, truly burned out, check yourself into a hospital severe exhaustion, where even writing was a chore (which is when I realized how deep into the hell I was) burnout. And in the last few years, I’ve dealt with several things that are categorized as trauma, some that defy explanation, and both my mind and body have responded accordingly (Maybe I will write about that publicly someday, and maybe that surreal, parallel universe feeling comes partly into play here as a trauma response). I know what happens when you push too hard for too long. I just think there’s a difference between resting and disconnecting from what centers you. And for me, writing—however small, however sloppy—is what brings me back to myself.

I’ve been prolific recently, perhaps it is the unshackling I spoke of in an earlier blog. This is all that stuff, good and bad, that has happened in my 60+ years being pumped to the surface in one form or another. Eventually, it may all come out in published form, much of it is still unpublished, some visceral and some not so much. A friend asked me about all this writing spewing out of me over the last few months, as I’ve slowly recovered from burnout and those traumatic events I mentioned. He asked, “Why now?” “I don’t know,” I responded. “Maybe it’s just time for it to come out.”

So no, I’m not complaining about the long weekend. But I’ve learned this: I need to write five days a week, six is better. It’s not about pressure; it’s about a pressure valve and peace. If I go too long without it, I don’t relax. I unravel. Writing isn’t just how I earn a living. It’s how I stay sane and how I process the hard stuff and find the beauty in the quagmire.

And that’s the thing I’ll carry into the next long weekend. I can rest. I should rest. But I also need to scribble down a thought or two, maybe even shape a paragraph. Not because anyone’s waiting for it, but because I am. I don’t write to impress; I write to stay alive. And three days without it? That’s pushing my luck.

Rant No. 1: The Screeching, Hellish Kid in the Restaurant

I’m happy, easygoing, and optimistic, but like most people, certain things get under my skin—not always, just sometimes. With that in mind, a multi-part Rant Series begins, designed to get a few things off my chest every Tuesday, with maybe some attempt at humor thrown in. Without further delay …

You’re out for dinner with a friend because you’ve both earned this. A hot meal you didn’t have to cook, a drink in hand, and maybe a little peace and quiet. Then you hear it. A scream. A high-pitched, glass-rattling, ear-piercing screech that echoes off the overhead lamps, the walls, and deep into your bones. You may even jump from your seat. There it is: The Screeching Restaurant Kid. He’s got a straw and a full-size drink cup, and he’s going to slurp every last molecule, even when it’s empty, especially when it’s empty, because the straw slurp is just the soundtrack to his chaos.

The screeching isn’t cute; it’s annoying to everyone else. It’s not a giggle and it’s not a laugh. It’s a noise that cuts through conversation like a foghorn in a broom closet. And every time the kid does it, the parents nod and say, “Oh, he’s just full of energy today!” No. He’s full of Coca-Cola and pure sonic destruction that shattered a window two blocks away. The slurping? That will never end. There’s nothing left in the cup. You know it. I know it. The parents and the server know it. But that straw keeps going — echoing like a clogged drain in a horror movie. It’s like they gave him a megaphone and said, “Here, play with this at full volume to irritate as many as possible in the restaurant.”

The table looks like an F5 tornado went through it. There are lime wedges on the floor, grease-laden finger smudges on the window, a half-eaten meatball on the seat, sauce and spaghetti everywhere, eight open but not used sugar packets on the table, and crayons in the water pitcher. This isn’t dinner, but it is a parenting philosophy test, and right now, the philosophy is “Let lawlessness reign and the hell with the fellow diners.” The kids are under the table one minute, climbing the booth and staring into the neighboring booth’s diners the next, and then back on the sticky floor they go.

Meanwhile, the parents are in their own world and smile sweetly, saying, “They’re just tired.” “They are just expressive,” or “This is how kids learn boundaries.” Is it? Or are you just letting them train for a demolition derby in a place where people are trying to eat and servers are trying to serve without being tackled? We’re not saying leave. We’re saying Parent. Nobody expects perfect behavior because kids are kids, and some noise and mess is expected. However, there’s a difference between a child acting up and a parent checking out. Set a limit or offer a distraction. Take a walk outside with them. Don’t just sip your drink while the dining room becomes an amusement park.

Restaurants aren’t daycares with menus; they are places where people celebrate an anniversary, a birthday, a job promotion, decompress after a hectic day, or commiserate. Your child or children may be the center of your world, but when they are screaming, and we mean screaming mid-meal, they’ve become the center of everyone’s attention and not in a good way.

So next time you’re out, and your kid starts to reenact The Battle of Endor from the Star Wars franchise in the middle of the main course, ask yourself: Is this cute or chaos that is grating on everyone in the place? If they’re slurping into a straw that’s been dry since the appetizer and yelling loud enough to shift glassware … we already know the answer.

Summer Memories – How the Smallest Things Leave the Biggest Impressions

There’s something magical about summer. Maybe the longer days, the warmth in the air, or the slower pace invite us to soak it all in. But what is interesting about summer is how the most ordinary moments can be etched in our memories for years or even decades.

Big trips or extravagant events often make lasting impressions. And yes, those are wonderful. But ask anyone about a favorite summer memory, and more often than not, it’s something simple: the smell of a campfire, the feel of grass under bare feet, the taste of a dripping ice cream cone on a hot day.

Summer is an experience of the senses, and that’s part of what makes it so memorable. Think of the smell of freshly cut grass (love it), the taste of grilled corn on the cob drenched with butter (oh, yeah) or the cool relief of a breeze after a scorcher of a day (ahhh, it feels great) these small sensations get stored deep in our brains and linked to feelings of joy, comfort, or nostalgia.

Sometimes we put pressure on ourselves to create the perfect summer, packed with activities, road trips, and Facebook and Instagram-worthy moments. However, some of the best memories are born when we’re not trying so hard.

It could be a spontaneous swim in the lake. A quiet cup of coffee on the deck before the world wakes up. Or a story shared during a neighborhood walk just as the sun sets and the fireflies start to glow. Even the messier moments of sunburns, sudden rainstorms, or dropped hot dogs (inevitably, someone always drops a hotdog on the patio or lawn and the dog gets an unexpected treat) can turn into favorite stories later.

The key to capturing summer magic is being present and slowing down enough to notice the little things. Our lives are so often busy, and during other seasons, we’re stuck in routines. Summer gives us a chance to loosen the grip a little. You don’t need a plane ticket or a packed schedule. A backyard, a porch, or a drive with the windows down can be a setting for something quietly unforgettable. Let your phone sit inside. Watch the clouds. Pick berries. Let the dog get wet and muddy. Let the kids stay up past bedtime just once. These are the moments you’ll remember.

As summer unfolds, think less about what you should be doing and more about how you want to feel: connected with people, not devices, calm, energized, joyful. Then, look for the moments that deliver those feelings, even in small doses. Instead of scrolling, try stargazing in a remote location. Instead of planning every hour of a weekend, leave space for spontaneity. Instead of chasing the “perfect” summer, embrace the real one with barbeques, bonfires, avoiding mosquito clouds, fishing, and the simple things.

What will you remember about this summer five or ten years from now? Chances are, it won’t be the perfect photo or the expensive activity. It’ll be a moment that surprises you. One that made you feel at ease, alive, or connected to something bigger than yourself. The best summer memories aren’t always made on purpose. But they do tend to show up when we’re paying attention.

When a First Date Becomes a One-Man Show

So, a client/friend and I are sitting in a family restaurant several weeks ago and we weren’t trying to eavesdrop, but some performances are loud enough—and too tragically awkward—not to witness. Across from us, a couple, probably in their late forties, were clearly on a first date. You could tell by the awkward energy, the slightly-too-formal shirt he wore (untucked but trying), and the hopeful-but-resigned look on her face that screamed, “Please let him be normal.”

He wasn’t. From the get-go, this man launched into what can only be described as a monologue that would have made Shakespeare proud, if Shakespeare had been into bad romantic-comedies, a review of every Pink Floyd album, and extended metaphors about life through the lens of 1990s movies. We shouldn’t have, but we quietly laughed and clocked it—eighteen minutes straight without pause except for taking quick bites. No questions. No conversational handoffs. Just him, flapping his gums and waving a burger like a baton as he spoke, and explaining why “The Godfather III is actually misunderstood.”

Meanwhile, his date sat there like a polite hostage. Nodding occasionally, sipping water like it was whiskey, and glancing toward the restroom with the longing of a woman who’d just remembered she left the oven on at home. She took two bathroom breaks in half an hour, which we all know is code for “I need a breather before I gnaw my own arm off.”

We watched him try to reach across the table to touch her hand; a bold move for a guy who had yet to let her finish a sentence. She smoothly retracted it like a blackjack dealer clearing the felt. Hand gone and interest gone. Her mind? Probably hovering over the exit, waiting for her body to catch up. And you could feel it. That slow, sinking ship of a date. The kind where you imagine her texting a friend in the bathroom: “This date sucks big time. Give me an excuse to get out of here fast.”

Eventually, she reemerged, powered through the rest of her meal in silence, and when it came time for the check, she stood up first. No lingering. No “this was fun” fakeout. Just a quick “thanks” and a beeline for the door and her car. Alone. It looked like someone fleeing the scene of a crime. He stayed behind, looking confused. He probably wondered if he could have improved his chances by bringing up his conspiracy theories about the decline of CDs after dessert instead of during the appetizer.

And look, I’m not trying to be cruel here. Dating is hard at any age. It’s awkward, vulnerable, and full of weird energy exchanges. But, gentlemen—and I say this with a voice that hopes you find happiness with someone: she is not a prop in your life story. She’s a human being with a voice, so let her use it. Ask a question and then another question based on that answer. Be genuinely interested, or fake it if the topic bores you. At the very least, chew with your mouth closed and don’t conduct the Boston Symphony Orchestra with your burger mid-sentence. Conversation is not a TED Talk. It’s a two-way street. If one person is doing all the talking and the other is slowly Googling emergency exits with their eyes, you’re not on a date—you’re holding someone hostage in your dinner theater.

And it’s not just about romance. This is true for life in general. If someone is sitting across from you, engage with them. Ask about their day, thoughts, and favorite type of cheesecake; be curious and present. Or at least be brief. That night was a masterclass on what not to do on a first date. If your date goes to the bathroom twice in thirty minutes and leaves without a goodbye, your burger soliloquy needs some serious editing.

When Noticing Is A Strategic Asset

“You notice things most people don’t.” The words hung in the air, a casual observation that landed with surprising weight. At first, I shrugged it off. Didn’t everyone see the chipped paint shaped like an iguana on the park bench, the subtle shift in the barista’s demeanor, the way a particular song could instantly transport someone back in time and the look on their face when it did.

But the comment lingered, a quiet hum beneath the surface of my daily life. And the more I pondered it, the more I realized there might be a kernel of truth in that simple statement. It wasn’t about being exceptionally intelligent or possessing some kind of photographic memory. It was more about a particular way of engaging with the world, a heightened awareness of the subtle textures that often fade into the background for others.

For me, the world isn’t just a stage with broad strokes and loud pronouncements. It’s a tapestry woven with intricate details, whispered nuances, and unspoken stories etched into the everyday. I find myself drawn to the periphery, the fleeting expressions on faces in a crowd, the almost imperceptible tremor in a hand, the way sunlight catches dust motes dancing in the air, the way trees seem bare one day and full of leaves the next.

It’s not a conscious effort, not a deliberate act of scrutiny. It’s more like a natural inclination, a tuning of the senses to a frequency that often goes unheard. While others might focus on the main event, my attention often drifts to the supporting cast, backdrop, and quiet moments that reveal so much about the larger picture.

This can manifest in countless ways. I might notice the specific shade of blue of a child’s forgotten toy lying in the grass, and a wave of untold stories washes over me. I might pick up on the barely perceptible shift in the atmosphere of a room, sensing tension or excitement before it’s explicitly voiced. I might hear the faint melody of a bird call that others seem oblivious to, and for a moment, everything else fades away. I’m the guy who goes to a concert or sports event and is almost as interested in how they put the stage together or how the baseball grounds crew does their job. Yeah, I watch the Zamboni, sometimes two now, go around the ice between periods. Not just one lap, most of them.

Sometimes, this heightened awareness feels like a secret language, a private conversation between me and the world. I see connections and patterns that others might miss, weaving together seemingly disparate observations into a richer understanding of a situation or a person. It’s like having access to a hidden layer of reality, a subtle commentary playing beneath the surface of the obvious.

Of course, this way of perceiving the world isn’t mine alone and isn’t always a walk in the park. It can be overwhelming at times, with a constant influx of sensory information that can feel like a low-grade hum of anxiety. The weight of unspoken emotions, the awareness of subtle shifts in mood, and the constant awareness of small imperfections can sometimes feel like a burden. I’m the guy who comes up with a blog idea, which then begets several more on different topics or perhaps an entire series on one topic and all from an observation.

There are moments when I want to tune it all out, glide through the world with a more selective filter, and focus only on the big picture. But then, I would miss the quiet beauty of a single raindrop clinging to a leaf, the unspoken understanding in a shared glance, and the resilience and experience etched in the lines of an aging face. I would also miss golden opportunities to write about it, right down to an article about how the patio crowd is different, or whatever else I store in my mind and then transfer to the keyboard.

And there are moments when this ability proves surprisingly insightful. I might notice a flicker of hesitation in someone’s eyes that contradicts their confident words or a subtle inconsistency in a story that raises a quiet alarm bell. It’s not about being judgmental or suspicious but about recognizing the subtle cues that often betray the truth.

Ultimately, noticing what others might miss isn’t about being superior or different. It’s simply a different way of experiencing the world, a lens through which reality is filtered. It’s about finding wonder in the mundane, meaning in the minute, and stories in the silence. It’s about appreciating the intricate beauty of the everyday, the quiet hum of the unseen that often holds the most profound truths. And while it might sometimes feel like carrying a little extra weight, it also enriches my life in countless, immeasurable ways, reminding me that the world is always speaking, if only we take the time to listen and truly see.

The Power of Showing Up When You Don’t Feel Like It

There are days when everything in you says, “Not today.” When your energy is low, your motivation is in first gear, and your mind yells “What’s the point?!” or “I don’t care anymore.” On those days, it’s easy to disappear and avoid the world. To skip the to-do list, cancel the project, or crawl back into bed. We’ve all been there and yes, sometimes we do need to shut it down for a couple of days, and we do need vacations. But here’s something I’ve learned the hard way: The most powerful changes in life don’t come from perfect days—they come from the days you show up anyway and, as Nike used to say, “Just Do It.”

This took me a long time to accept and apply in my life. I expected, no, internally demanded, every day to be perfect or nearly perfect and felt like I had let myself and others down when it wasn’t. I expected to start every day at 5 a.m. No, not wake up at 5, be going at top speed at 5 a.m. Try and sustain that during the dark, freezing mornings of winter with an icy wind howling and rattling the windows. Not anymore, not for a long time. All the experiences and life lessons I have gained are serving me better now than had my life been smooth sailing. I’ve had great jobs that I loved and done jobs that I hated just to keep money coming in during rough patches. I’ve washed dishes, bussed tables, done roofing work including the tear off, cleaned office buildings, retail stores, and toilets at 2 a.m., and hand-bombed rocks into large baskets all day for weeks for flood control, among various jobs. I’ve overcome many things, including numerous bouts of depression, anxiety, and a few things I won’t get into here, but maybe I will some other time. I’ve changed stuff I could and learned to accept things I can’t change, albeit reluctantly so. This is not to brag or lament but to say I speak from experience.

Motivation is nice when it’s there, but it’s not reliable. It’s tied to mood, food you consumed, weather, sleep, blood sugar, and a million other unpredictable things. Waiting for it can lead to weeks or years of stagnation. You don’t need motivation. You need a reason. A purpose bigger than how you feel in the moment. That might be your health. Your freedom. Your peace of mind. Your family. Your dream. Your spiritual healing. Your integrity. Even if you don’t feel “fired up” and wake up late, you can still take one small action today. And that one action leads to two, three, and maybe more. You’re building something, even if it doesn’t look like much today.

Showing up doesn’t mean going full throttle every day. Sometimes, showing up means sending one email, walking for 10 minutes instead of 60, and eating one healthy meal when you’ve had a rough week. But showing up, especially when you don’t feel like it at first, keeps the fire and the habit alive. It’s about keeping the commitment alive. It tells your mind that “I am still in this, and I am in it for the long haul.”

Consistency wins where intensity burns out. The writer who keeps writing, even a paragraph, when uninspired, improves. The entrepreneur who sends emails during dry spells still builds momentum. The professional tennis player who still hits the practice court for only half an hour rather than the usual two or three, even when he doesn’t feel like it. The person rebuilding their life who keeps moving forward and finds strength they didn’t know they had.

The hardest part is that showing up often feels like it’s not working. You’re not seeing the changes fast enough, and you’re not getting the work, the feedback, or any response that tells you you are putting in the time and effort. It feels like you’re pouring into a black hole and not even making a dent. But that’s when it matters most. You’re developing something under the surface: resilience, discipline, a steely resolve, character, and inner strength. Growth happens quietly and slowly, and the weight you’re lifting or losing might feel small today. The weight you want to lose, especially if it’s a big number, seems like a Mount Everest-like task, but over time, you’ll realize it was never really about the weight. It’s about progressing one step and day at a time, and it was about becoming the kind of person who doesn’t quit. If you show up every day, the desired result will come.

If you take one thing from this, let it be this: You don’t need to be perfect and won’t be. You just need to be present. You don’t have to crush it. You just have to keep going. You’ll have bad days, days when you are dragging and that one draft you write feels like you’re writing War and Peace, and days when you stumble and screw-up. That’s human. But the fact that you keep returning to the work, to the healing, to the effort—that’s what changes your life. And if you’re in a season where it feels like you’re crawling? Keep crawling. Don’t discount small victories. They count.

You don’t have to wait for the stars to align or for motivation to appear at your door. Show up messy. Show up tired, irritable, and wearing yesterday’s shirt. Show up uncertain. Just show up. Because the person who shows up—especially when they don’t feel like it—is already ahead of 90 percent of people still waiting to “feel ready.”

Did Titanic’s Mother Cat Warn of Disaster and Leave with her Brood?

Years ago, I listened to a call-in talk show that discussed the day’s topics and whatever else was on people’s minds. It was a serious show for the most part, but occasionally, the well-respected host threw it wide open with some subjects on the lighter side. Some of those lighter shows included who you would like to be stranded on a desert island with (some answers surprised me. You’d really rather be stranded with Eric Clapton so he could teach you a few guitar licks than with Cheryl Ladd at her most gorgeous?), why The Trouble With Tracy was the worst sitcom ever, and what genres of music you hate and why. This is one of those blog entries that straddles the serious and the fun side while examining the human condition. So, let’s get to it.

The famous ship, a marvel of Edwardian engineering and allegedly unsinkable, sat poised in Southampton, ready to embark across the Atlantic. Yet, amidst the bustling activity and hopeful anticipation, a different kind of tale whispers through the annals of Titanic lore – the story of a mother cat and her litter, said to have disembarked days before the fateful departure, seemingly sensing the impending disaster. While widely circulated, this charming anecdote is more likely a poignant urban legend than a historical fact. However, its enduring popularity speaks volumes about our fascination with premonition, connection with the animal world, and inherent desire to find meaning in the face of tragedy.

The kernel of truth within this legend lies in the documented presence of a ship’s cat named Jenny aboard the Titanic. Stewardess Violet Jessop, a survivor of the disaster, recalled Jenny as a resident of the vessel who had recently given birth to kittens while the ship was in Belfast. Ships often harbored cats to control rodent populations, making Jenny a functional and furry crew member. The legend embellishes this reality, painting a scene of Jenny, with an almost supernatural intuition, carrying her kittens off the ship one by one in Southampton. Some versions even include a laborer, Jim Mulholland, who witnesses this feline exodus, taking it as an ill omen and choosing to leave the ship himself. This decision would save his life from the upcoming tragedy. Did this happen as reported? It’s possible, but has never been proven.

Why does this story continue to capture imaginations despite its lack of concrete evidence? Firstly, it taps into our deep-seated belief in premonition, the idea that specific individuals, or even animals, can sense future events. In the aftermath of a catastrophe like the Titanic, the human mind naturally seeks patterns and explanations, sometimes attributing uncanny foresight to seemingly prescient acts. The image of a mother protecting her young by fleeing upcoming danger resonates deeply with our primal instincts and understanding of maternal bonds. It offers a comforting, albeit perhaps fantastical, sense that the disaster wasn’t entirely random, that there were subtle warnings that some, if only animals, could grasp that something wasn’t right.

The story also highlights our anthropomorphic tendencies – our inclination to attribute human-like emotions and reasoning to animals. We imbue Jenny with a sense of knowing, a powerful maternal instinct that transcends the limitations of animal intelligence as we typically understand it. This humanization allows us to connect with the story on an emotional level, transforming a simple act of a cat moving her kittens into a message of impending doom. It’s a way to find a relatable element within the tragedy’s almost incomprehensible scale. Can animals sense upcoming events? Yes, they can, and I sometimes witnessed this when our dog got antsy even after a good walk or run hours before a thunderstorm, but this didn’t happen every time the dark clouds rolled in and the heavens rumbled. And our cat slept through the entire event nearly every time, including well before the storm hit.

The Jenny story, even in its possibly fictional form, adds a layer of poignant foreshadowing to the Titanic’s story. It introduces a subtle whisper of impending doom before the tragedy unfolds. This enhances the dramatic irony of the story, making the subsequent disaster feel almost inevitable, as if Jenny, and perhaps the animals that did embark from Southampton with their owners, knew what fate awaited the supposedly unsinkable ship.

While the tale of the Titanic cat and her brood presciently fleeing the doomed ship in Southampton is likely (though not certainly) an urban legend, its enduring appeal lies in its potent combination of our belief in premonition, our emotional connection with animals, and our human need to find meaning and perhaps even a sense of warning within the face of overwhelming tragedy. It serves as a reminder of our ongoing fascination with the unknown and our tendency to weave narratives that help us understand the complexities of the world, even when those narratives blur the lines between fact and fiction.

The Solo Pint And Unpacking the Gendered Landscape of Public Relaxation

This is the last entry in the bar series.

That observation about men frequently enjoying a couple of beers alone in public while seeing women do the same with wine (or any beverage) far less often intrigues me. It’s a seemingly minor detail of everyday life. Yet, it speaks volumes about ingrained social scripts, perceptions of safety, and even the way we’re subtly conditioned to occupy public spaces based on our gender.

Think about the visual. A man sitting at a bar, nursing a pint, perhaps lost in thought or idly watching a game on the screen, often blends into the background. He’s perceived as unwinding, possibly contemplating his day, enjoying a moment of solitary peace. There’s a certain accepted normalcy to this image.

Now, picture a woman in the same scenario. Immediately, the context shifts. Is she waiting for someone? Is she lonely and wants company? Is she more vulnerable? Unfair as it is, societal conditioning often leads to a different set of assumptions and interpretations. Her solitude in a public drinking space can be perceived as an anomaly, even a slight deviation from the expected.

One factor at play is the persistent, albeit slowly eroding, issue of safety and the perception of vulnerability. Historically, and sadly still in many ways, public spaces, particularly those involving alcohol, have been viewed as potentially less safe for women alone. The fear of unwanted attention, harassment, or even more serious threats can understandably make women less inclined to seek solitary relaxation in such environments. The simple act of enjoying a drink alone can carry a different weight of potential risk for a woman than it does for a man.

Furthermore, traditional gender roles have subtly shaped our expectations around public behavior. Men have often been afforded more social permission to occupy public spaces independently, to find camaraderie or solitude outside the domestic sphere. The “man cave” archetype, while often a caricature, reflects a societal acceptance of men seeking individual downtime in public or semi-public settings. Women’s socialization, on the other hand, has historically emphasized more communal or domestic settings for relaxation and socializing. While these boundaries are thankfully becoming more fluid, the echoes of these traditional roles can still influence our perceptions and behaviors.

The way the media portrays these scenarios also plays a subtle role. The lone male protagonist in countless films and television shows often finds solace or contemplation in a bar with a drink. While female characters are increasingly shown in similar settings, the sheer volume and historical prevalence of the “solitary man at the bar” trope can reinforce its perceived normalcy.

Beyond societal perceptions, there might also be differences in preferred modes of solitary relaxation. Perhaps women are more inclined towards other forms of solo unwinding in public, such as reading in a café, browsing a bookstore, or enjoying a quiet meal. These activities might carry less of the historical baggage and perceived vulnerability associated with a woman drinking alone in a bar.

It’s crucial to emphasize that these are broad observations, not absolute truths. Women enjoying drinks alone in public is becoming more commonplace. However, the disparity in frequency likely reflects the complex interplay of safety concerns, historical gender roles, societal perceptions, and perhaps even subtle differences in preferred ways of seeking solitary respite.

Ultimately, the image of a man quietly enjoying a beer alone shouldn’t be inherently more “normal” than a woman doing the same with a glass of wine. As societal norms continue to evolve and as public spaces become more inclusive and (hopefully) safe for everyone, we can hope to see these gendered disparities in everyday observations fade further into the background, allowing everyone the simple freedom of a solitary moment of public relaxation without undue scrutiny or assumption.

Let There Be Light (But Not in This Restaurant, Apparently)

It’s been five straight days of cloud cover. Five days of that washed-out gray light that makes everything — and everyone — look tired. So when I woke up today and saw blue sky and bright sun pouring through the windows like a long-lost friend, I figured people would be flocking to patios and parks. I didn’t expect to have to fight for daylight inside a restaurant. Yet here I am, seated at a window table with a friend in a place that brags about its “natural light,” and patio by the water, watching the staff rush to close the blinds like vampires on the run from a crucifix.

Why? Because “management prefers them closed.” Let’s be clear: management isn’t even here. But their shadowy legacy lives on, apparently in the form of blackout blinds on the parking lot side that must remain pulled down no matter what the weather — or the mood — outside. Ours is open, but from the outside, as people drive by, this place looks closed.

It’s not just this place. Restaurants everywhere — nice ones, chain ones, trendy ones — seem to be in a race to see who can create the most dimly lit cave without accidentally turning the place into a haunted house. Even at lunch. Even with massive windows that cost a fortune to install. Sunshine? Natural light? Apparently, it clashes with the “ambience.” Restaurant lighting is almost always set to “mood” — as if every meal is a Tinder date or a marriage proposal. You need a flashlight just to read the menu, and forget taking a decent photo of your food unless your phone has NASA-grade camera tech. But here’s the thing: Many don’t want candlelight vibes with their lunch. They don’t care about looking ten years younger in flattering light if it means they’re squinting to see what they are eating. And when we’ve had a week of gloom and rain, it’s okay to let the sun do its thing for a few days. Sunlight puts us in a better mood; it’s been proven.

They say it’s for “ambience.” Fine. But what about actual ambience? You know, the kind where people are happy and energized because they’re not sitting in a film noir at noon? What about the mental health benefits of sunlight — something folks around here are craving like oxygen after days of drizzle? Instead, restaurants chase that elusive aesthetic: soft lighting, shadows, “warm glow” bulbs that make everything feel like 8 p.m. no matter what time it is. And it’s not just aesthetic. Some say it hides imperfections — worn floors, chipped plates, tired decor. Others claim it makes people linger longer, spend more, and feel better about themselves.

But there’s a time and place for dim lighting. A sunny Monday in May after a week of downpour isn’t it. Here’s an idea: Let your customers decide if they want sunshine or shade. Ask us. If I want the blind open, let it stay open. If the next table prefers the blinds down, cool — let them eat in peace under the glow of whatever moody bulb you’ve strung from the ceiling. But stop assuming that a dark room equals a great experience. Sometimes, we want lots of natural light, a good cup of coffee, and to read the menu without holding it at a 45-degree angle under the table lamp.

I get it. Not every restaurant can cater to every preference. But when the clouds finally part and the sun comes out to make us all feel better, happier, and more energetic, let it come in and wash over us. After five days of gray, we didn’t come here for the vibe; we came here for the view.

The Blue-and-White Echo Chamber And How Toronto Sports Media Helps Keep The Leafs Stuck

A modified version was originally posted on Substack

It’s not just the players and the coaches. And it’s not the curse of Harold Ballard, Gary Bettman’s fault, the referee’s fault, a league-wide conspiracy against the Leafs, the three games in four nights to finish a season, any season, that wore the team down. No, it’s not the pressure of playing in Toronto under the media glare, playing in the wrong division or conference, or whatever fits the bill of fifty-eight years of excuses.

The Toronto sports media echo chamber is one of the most overlooked forces keeping the Toronto Maple Leafs locked in this eternal loop of hype and heartbreak. It’s a high-decibel, self-reinforcing swirl of hot takes, nostalgia, unwarranted optimism, selective criticism, and corporate conflict of interest. And it’s been warping reality in Leafland for a long time.

Let’s break it down: The Leafs are owned by Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment (MLSE). MLSE is majority-owned by Rogers (75 percent, with their recently added 37.5 percent stake bought from Bell, owners of The Sports Network), the same Rogers that also owns Sportsnet, the most expansive sports media presence in Canada. In April 2025, Rogers secured a 12-year, C$11 billion national media rights deal with the NHL, extending their exclusive broadcasting rights through the 2037–38 season.

So let’s get this straight:

The team is owned by the same corporation that covers the team.
The journalists, analysts, and talking heads who appear are paid by the same companies that sign the team’s checks.
The coverage, commentary, and critique all exist under the same roof as the product they should evaluate objectively.

See the problem? When the people covering the team are also in business with the team, it’s no surprise that objectivity gets watered down, harsh truths get softened, failures get reframed, and problems become narratives. Fans don’t get reality — they get corporate storytelling.

Case in point: Every fall, Leafs Nation is told that “this is the year.” Maybe not in so many words, but there are strong hints. The core has matured and is more battle-hardened than ever. The offseason moves were shrewd. The goaltending is good, with maybe a few blips, but it is Stanley Cup Final-worthy. The cap is under control. And no, they didn’t need to get tougher, well, a bit more grit in the playoffs; they just need to be themselves. Every year, it’s the same spin, and it seems like only the Toronto Maple Leafs tried to get better in the off-season or at the trade deadline. And every spring, when the inevitable collapse arrives, the same media machine goes to work shifting the narrative:

“They played well enough to win.”
“They lost to a great team.”
“They’ll grow and learn from this.”
“The No. 1 goalie was injured.”
“Look how close it was — just one bounce and one game when it comes right down to it.
“A few calls didn’t go their way, which made a difference.”
“They were playing with a few injuries.”
“They were up 3-1 in game three, had they won that one, they’d be up 3-0 in the series.”

But when is close no longer good enough? When do some stop handing out maturity medals and start demanding results? You won’t hear many probing questions about culture, locker room dynamics, or real accountability. You won’t see panel discussions wondering if a fundamentally flawed leadership group or dressing room chemistry is at the heart of the problem. Instead, the media dances around it — partly to protect access, partly because of internal pressure, and partly because conflict doesn’t sell in a market that’s been trained to hope, not demand. You see the real story in a few insightful comments online and from selected columnists who aren’t afraid to ask the tough questions and write hard-hitting columns, but not in a media company that owns the team. In most markets, the media drives accountability. In Toronto, it often deflects it.

Can you imagine the Philadelphia media letting the Flyers off the hook like this? Or the Boston media playing softball with the Bruins? Toronto’s media complex has become less a watchdog and more a warm blanket wrapping the team in comfort, regardless of outcomes. After all, they are treated like gods, said one player, after the 2024 version of the annual collapse. Not all Toronto media are complicit in this, just some.

Let’s be clear: Toronto fans are some of the most loyal and passionate sports fans. They’ve filled the arena for decades. They deserve better than panel shows designed to insulate rather than investigate. They deserve analysis with teeth, not roundtable therapy sessions for another blown Game 7 and a funeral-like atmosphere in the studio. Fans can handle the truth. What they can’t handle anymore is the gaslighting and the sense that maybe they’re the problem for expecting more, booing, and criticizing the sacred “core four.” This writer applauded those disgusted fans who tossed their jerseys on the ice and walked out with ten minutes left.

When there’s no real pressure from the media, there’s no real pressure on the front office. When fans are fed a steady diet of emotional copium instead of hard questions, they settle for “almost.” When the broadcast partner is also the landlord, the bar stays low. This is how a team becomes stuck. This is how a culture of underachievement takes root. And this is how one of the wealthiest, most resource-heavy organizations in the NHL can go over twenty years without getting past the second round and still be called successful because they win a lot in the regular season. Until the echo chamber breaks, the cycle will continue.

But step outside of Leafland, and you’ll find cities where the media doesn’t coddle; it confronts. Where excuses aren’t just questioned, they are torched, cut off at the knees. Let’s look at three of North America’s toughest sports media markets: Boston, Edmonton, and Philadelphia, and how their approach starkly contrasts with Toronto’s corporate pablum.

Boston is a city addicted to winning. With the Patriots, Red Sox, Celtics, and Bruins all delivering championships this century, the bar is sky-high, and the media helps keep it there. Here’s the difference: the gloves come off when a Boston team underperforms. The Bruins lose in the first round or don’t make the playoffs, as happened this year? The Boston Globe, NESN, and local sports radio and television don’t spin it as “progress” or “a learning opportunity, we will grow from this.” They ask fundamental questions: Why didn’t the coach adapt? Who didn’t show up? Are the players hungry, and if not, why not? Is there a problem with dressing room chemistry, and who may cause it? The same applies to ownership and management. Nobody is protected, and no one gets a pass. And when a player says something tone-deaf, the headlines reflect that. The pressure in Boston is immense, but it drives accountability and forces results. It also explains, in part, why the Bruins have remained competitive even while retooling because there’s simply no tolerance for “almost” being good enough.

Edmonton may not have (the city of) Boston’s championship pedigree in recent decades, but its fans and media are fiercely engaged. The Oilers have won five Stanley Cups since entering the league in 1979-80 and eight trips to the Final. The Leafs? Zero. Not even one trip to the Final for the blue and white. What’s unique about Edmonton is that it’s a small-market team with a large-market fanbase. When the Oilers falter, the questions aren’t sugarcoated. Local media from TSN 1260 to The Edmonton Journal to independent outlets like OilersNation will criticize coaching decisions, challenge front-office moves, and openly debate whether the McDavid-Draisaitl era is being squandered. And they’re not afraid to take aim at the stars. If Draisaitl or McDavid has a bad game, it gets called out, not buried under platitudes. While the Oilers haven’t broken through yet, they’ve shown far more urgency than the Leafs in making bold moves, from coaching changes to deadline deals. Edmonton’s media doesn’t babysit the team; they hold up a mirror.

Then there’s Philadelphia, a city where sports media comes with brass knuckles and no filter. The media is brutally honest all the time. It’s not just the Flyers who feel the heat. The Eagles, Phillies, and 76ers get roasted when they fall short. Philadelphia media reflects the city. Gritty, skeptical, impatient. If you choke in the playoffs or give a half-hearted quote to the press, you’ll hear about it on talk radio, local channels, in columns, and from knowledgeable fans who read and study what was said. Philly doesn’t do spin, they do standards. Teams don’t get to coast on potential, and coaches get fired mid-season. Front offices don’t hide behind PR statements. There’s a direct line between fan expectations, media pressure, and organizational urgency. The difference isn’t just tone, it’s consequence. Media heat translates into real pressure in Boston, Edmonton, and Philly, forcing change. In Toronto, the machine reboots and tries again with the same media faces and script. It’s easy to see how the Leafs stay stuck.

Let’s go through some of the greatest hits this year, some of which have come from fans who have bought into the excuse factory:

1. Their top goalie was out.
Andrew Stolarz got injured. Yes, it’s unfortunate. But if your backup goalie, who you’ve been hyping all season, is that close to being just as good, why is this a fallback excuse? Isn’t building a team supposed to include depth? This was a 1A/1B situation all year. At least, that’s what the spin was.

2. It’s a tough conference.
Sure, the East is brutal. You have Florida, Tampa Bay, Washington, Carolina, and some up-and-comers. The Leafs lost to the defending champions in 2025, but wasn’t this supposed to be their year? It’s different this year, was the mantra. Didn’t they win the Atlantic? And yet, they were blown out twice in their own rink against Florida, including game seven. And, hey, whatever happened to their famous core four that was going to lead them to the promised land?

3. It’s Bettman’s fault.
Right. Because the NHL Commissioner is sitting in his Manhattan office, scheming new ways to keep Toronto from winning. Gary Bettman is why Mitch Marner can’t shoot the puck in the second round and Auston Matthews disappears. It’s Bettman’s fault that Stolarz gets hurt, Woll lets in a few softies, and the Leafs collapse and are thoroughly outclassed in games five and seven without even a shot on goal in the first ten minutes of the latter.

4. It’s the refs.
This is the new old favorite that I have heard since I was six. “The refs are out to get us.” It’s the ref’s fault for missed calls, phantom penalties, inconsistent standards, and this happens to the Leafs and no one else. Sure, officiating in the NHL playoffs is sometimes questionable. How much do you call, and how much do you let go? But every team deals with that. You think the Panthers got every call? You believe the Oilers aren’t battling whistles and head-scratchers? Blaming the referees is the easiest and laziest way to avoid saying what few in the Leafland media want to say: they weren’t good enough. I’ll repeat that. The Toronto Maple Leafs weren’t and aren’t good enough. They haven’t been since 1967.

5. It’s a curse.
Right. Because the universe just doesn’t like the Leafs. Decades of disappointment? It must be dark forces at work, the planet Mercury in retrograde, the eclipses – solar and lunar, meteor showers, the Orion constellation, or the minor turbulence their plane hit on the way back from Chicago five years ago. Maybe Harold Ballard cursed the team on his way out. Perhaps the ghost of 1967 has moved from Maple Leaf Gardens, settled into Scotiabank Arena, and refuses to leave. Or maybe it has nothing to do with the heavens and everything to do with poor roster construction and playoff jitters.

6. It’s a league-wide conspiracy.
This one’s for the real die-hards. Bettman, the refs, the media, American teams, and even the other Canadian teams are all in on it. Toronto can’t win because the league won’t let them. Every pre-season the stakeholders in this conspiracy have a Zoom meeting and come up with ingenious ways to scuttle the Leafs. Never mind that the league would probably love for this hockey-mad market and most profitable franchise to win one finally. Imagine the ratings. The merchandise sales, of which the League gets a cut. Imagine the happy chaos in Southern Ontario and pockets of Leaf fans throughout Canada. Imagine the parade as one of the league’s most storied franchises parades that Cup through the streets of downtown Toronto. This conspiracy theory collapses under its own weight.

7. It’s their travel schedule.
Ah, yes, the poor Leafs have to fly to Pittsburgh, Buffalo, and then Detroit for three games in four nights, or a similar circuit a few times a year. What a grind; it wore them down come playoff time. Try being the Vancouver Canucks and having to cross multiple time zones every other week. Or Seattle, Edmonton, and Calgary. Or the Sharks, Kings, and Ducks. And how about the Dallas Stars? Their closest opponent, the Colorado Avalanche, is 663 miles and one time zone away; most of the league deals with brutal travel. The Leafs, meanwhile, spend most of the year bouncing between first-class hotels in the eastern time zone. Enough.

The media bubble enables the status quo. This leads to softball coverage, endless excuse-making, and often a lack of serious accountability for team failures. When your media arm doubles as your PR department, the message to fans becomes: “Everything’s fine, just a few tweaks here and there, stay the course; the team is so close. If a few bad bounces went the other way, the Leafs would have a few Cups in recent years. The team is just unlucky. The injury bug hit at the worst time.” The owner and media gatekeeper has fostered a Leafs culture where accountability is muted, profits are protected, and success is defined more by content metrics than playoff results. They’re not the only reason for the Leafs’ failures, but they’ve certainly enabled it.